Skip to content Skip to footer

Data Access

Overview:

This lesson plan provides participants with a comprehensive overview of data accessibility, focusing on the distinctions between open and restricted access, the role of data licenses, and the ethical and legal considerations involved. Participants will engage with examples, participate in discussions, and apply their knowledge through interactive activities. The goal is to develop a clear understanding of how data accessibility impacts research and collaborations.

Data accessibility is the degree to which data can be easily accessed, understood, and used by authorized users when they need it. It ensures that people can obtain relevant data in a usable format to support reuse.

In the Life Sciences, data professionals often define it as the processes and ease with which data can be accessed, retrieved, and have a secondary use when authorized by its original participants and owners. This topic encompasses not only the technical access, but also the format, and documentation that allows for distinct levels of access. In the context of the FAIR principles: “Accessible” means that data should be retrievable by their identifier using a standard communications protocol. This protocol should be open, free, and universally implementable. While data access can be regulated (e.g., controlled or registered access), the protocol itself remains open and free.

Important or key definitions

Open Access: Means data is publicly available without requiring registration, approval, or special permissions. Anyone can discover, access, download, and reuse the data, subject only to licence conditions such as attribution. Open access is appropriate when there are no privacy, confidentiality, ethical, or contractual concerns.

Controlled Access: Refers to the mechanisms for sharing sensitive or personal data, when it has been properly pseudonymized or only after a formal application or approval process. This often involves legal agreements (e.g. Data Sharing Agreements, Data Processing Agreements)

Registered Access: A less restrictive form of controlled access, where users register and agree to specific terms of use, often without individual project-by-project approval but still with a clear record of who is accessing example of this, is request access in a Public Repository like DataverseNL

Restricted access: Often an umbrella term meaning “not open access”. Some organizations use it as a synonym for controlled access, while others use it more broadly for any access restrictions.

In this section aims to provide trainers with the foundational understandings of data accessibility, inspired by the FAIR principles and focusing on Life Sciences Data.

  • Data discoverability as the ability for users to find and locate the data they need
  • Data discoverability and its main components: rich and descriptive metadata, search, indexed and searchable repositories and centralized portals
  • Data Usability the degree to which (machines and humans) can read and understand the data
  • Data Quality: the quality of the data which should be clean consistent and free of errors, to be ready for immediate use.
  • Federated data access (local sources)
  • Relevant legislations, policies, and recommendations ( e.g. sensitive, personal data, contracts such as Data Transfer and Processing Agreements)

FAIR element(s)

  • A - Accessible: working with the community of researchers who have sensitive data and wish to know how to enable FAIR for data that needs to have controlled access.

Key Learning Outcomes:

1.0 Distinguish Access Protocols & Licensing: Evaluate the practical differences between open, restricted, and embargoed data access mechanisms while applying appropriate data licenses (e.g., Creative Commons, Open Data Commons) to govern reuse.

2.0 Navigate Legal and Ethical Boundaries: Resolve data-sharing friction points—including GDPR compliance, participant consent, and sensitive human subjects data—to determine responsible access conditions.

3.0 Formulate Transparent Data Access Strategies: Design clear data access statements and governance workflows that facilitate collaborative research while maintaining necessary ethical and legal safeguards.

Citations and Attributions:

Ritchie, F. (2016). Five safes: designing data access for research.

Summary of Tasks / Actions

1.0 Reading: FAIRsharing’s educational factsheet on databases

2.0 Exercise use case: Explore the COVID-19 data registries such as the WHO Global Clinical Platform or other in FAIRsharing.org. If you want to add a level of complexity look for data registry that contains personal and or sensitive data. These examples can be found at: https://fairsharing.org/FAIRsharing.42193d

3.0 Exercise: Define types of access modes (tip: use examples from own research field)

4.0 Exercise evaluate the following elements: A- The discoverability and how easy it was to find the data registry and the meta-data provided; B- The usability, the formats, and conditions of access; C- The quality of the data-set and opportunities for re-usability and inter-operability.

5.0 Exercise: The second part of the exercise is to write a reflection on the case study (FAIRness of it) and how it can be improved.

6.0 Exercise: Finally Prepare (contribute with) a use case from your institution and share its solution with the community via a github page


Materials / Equipment

  • Personal computer
  • Internet connection
  • Browser

References

  • Dyke, S.O.M., Linden, M., Lappalainen, I., Rambla De Argila, J., Carey, K., Lloyd, D., Spalding, J.D., Cabili, M.N., Kerry, G., Foreman, J., et al. (2018). Registered access: authorizing data access. European Journal of Human Genetics, 26, 1721-1731. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-018-0219-y
  • Gierasch, L.M., Davidson, N.O., Rye, K.A., & Burlingame, A.L. (2020). The data must be accessible to all. Journal of Lipid Research, 61(4), 465. Available at: https://www.jlr.org/article/S0022-2275(20)43495-9/fulltext
  • Research Data Management Support, Huijser, D., Moopen, N., Flores-Dourojeanni, J., Beltrán, M., de Bruijn, K., de Bruin, J., Capel, D., Dijkstra, F., Einarson, S., Folkers, J., et al. (2025). Data Privacy Handbook. Utrecht University. Available at: https://utrechtuniversity.github.io/dataprivacyhandbook/

Take home tasks/preparation

  • Understanding what principles to consider in a context of sharing sensitive data

Take Home Message:

Mastering data accessibility turns compliance into collaboration. By pairing proper data licenses with transparent access controls early, researchers protect sensitive outputs while building strong foundations for interdisciplinary sharing.

Lesson content

LO
Activity
Time
Type
Level
Before the lesson
1

Reading:

FAIRsharing’s educational factsheet on databases

20
Reading
During the lesson
1

Exercise:

Group discussion on a use case: Explore the COVID-19 data registries such as the WHO Global Clinical Platform or other in FAIRsharing.org. If you want to add a level of complexity look for data registry that contains personal and or sensitive data. These examples can be found at: https://fairsharing.org/FAIRsharing.42193d

20
Group exercise
3

Lecture:

Explain and define types of access modes (tip: use examples from own research field)

15 minutes
Lecture
3

Exercise

Based on the case study previously provide have participants evaluate the following elements:

A- The discoverability and how easy it was to find the data registry and the meta-data provided;

B- The usability, the formats, and conditions of access;

C- The quality of the data-set and opportunities for re-usability and inter-operability.

20 minutes
Group discussion
3

Exercise:

The second part of the exercise is to write a reflection on the case study (FAIRness of it) and how it can be improved.

20 minutes
Group exercise
6

Exercise:

Finally Prepare (contribute with) a use case from your institution and share its solution with the community via a github page

20 minutes
Individual exercise